Rontini Submarine BBS Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > General > U.S. Submarine Related
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Last Survivor of a Legendary World War II Sub
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

"The opinions posted here do not represent those of any company, organization, or group and are those only of the author of the respective post." - From Rontini

RontiniSubmarineBBS.com is proudly sponsored by Submarine Shop for Submariners. Your patronage helps support this BBS.

At Ron's direction, we have removed all forums that were not being actively posted to.


Last Survivor of a Legendary World War II Sub

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Bob View Drop Down
Rickover
Rickover


Joined: 06 Jan 2016
Status: Offline
Points: 904
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Last Survivor of a Legendary World War II Sub
    Posted: 01 Sep 2020 at 8:50pm

Meet the Last Survivor of a Legendary World War II Sub

1 Sep 2020
The San Diego Union-Tribune | By Diane Bell

Sept. 2 marks the 75th anniversary of the formal Japanese surrender ceremony that officially brought World War II to an end.

Navy veteran William "Bill" Leibold remembers that time well. He had just been released from a secret Japanese military compound, known as the "torture farm," after 10 months in captivity. His weight, he recalls, had dropped from 172 to less than 60 pounds.

"I try not to think of those days," says the Escondido resident, 97. "We weren't fed regularly."

Leibold was one of nine survivors of a crew of 87 on the Navy submarine, USS Tang. The sailors were plucked out of frigid ocean water by a Japanese patrol boat after the sub had aggressively attacked its convoy in the Formosa Strait en route to the Philippines.

After sinking to its watery grave on Oct. 25, 1944, the Tang was later credited with taking out 33 enemy ships, carrying out daring attacks and rescuing numerous downed airmen. It earned the WW II reputation as the most lethal Allied sub in the Pacific.

In a tragic quirk of fate, as the Tang fired its 24th and final torpedo before heading home that October night, the torpedo malfunctioned. Leibold was stationed on the bridge.

"When we fired, the torpedo surfaced instead of running as it should have. It flew out of the water and then went back down," he recalls. The erratic torpedo continued to splash up and down like a porpoise in a semi-circle on the port side, as the sub built up speed to move out of harm's way.

"All of us on the bridge were concerned, but I don't think any of us fully realized it was heading back to hit us in the stern," says Leibold, who served as chief boatswain's mate. "No one to this day knows what caused it to run erratic. Something just went wrong with the torpedo itself. Possibly it was damaged during loading into the tube. Any number of things could have happened. No one will ever know."

The rest is naval history. And the details are clearly imbedded in Leibold's memory:

"When it hit our stern, we went down fast. The aft torpedo room flooded. Half the compartments flooded rapidly.... I went down with the ship. I don't know how far. I was able to swim back to the surface. I could see the bow of the Tang still out of the water, but I couldn't swim against the current to get to it. None of the men on the bridge were able to swim back to the bow."

The disaster unfolded in the 2:30 a.m. darkness. Leibold guesses that maybe he was submerged about 50 feet before he felt a thud and started swimming upward.

Trying to stay afloat, Leibold kicked off his shoes and took off his trousers. He tied the pant legs together, tried to inflate them and slip them over his head to use as a lifesaver-like flotation device as the crew had been instructed, but they didn't hold air.

Eventually he heard a nearby voice call out. It was Floyd Caverly, a radio technician who, by luck, had been dispatched to the bridge to resolve a communication problem moments before the sinking.

"He told me he couldn't swim," says Leibold. "I told him he could float." Leibold continued to coax him on when to inhale and exhale in the choppy water to keep from drowning. Leibold later received the Navy and Marine Corps Medal for heroic conduct for supporting a shipmate in the water for eight hours.

It was discovered later that half of the 87 members were killed upon impact. Others were trapped in what had become a metal tomb on the ocean floor 180 feet deep. The incident made naval history because this was the only sub to have survivors ascend during an emergency without surface assistance by using the Momsen lung, a crude breathing device stored on the sub for use in such emergencies.

Some who reached the surface could not swim and drowned, Liebold says. In the end, only nine of the original 87 crew, including Leibold and three others from the bridge, survived the night and were picked up by the Japanese.

They were placed in solitary confinement in a navy compound in Ofuna, Japan but not classified as prisoners of war, Leibold says.

Nearly every day they were taken out to "swab the halls," he recalls, explaining it was really a ruse to give the guards "an opportunity to exercise what we called their baseball bats. We were beaten almost every time we were taken out of the cells."

When asked what kept him going, Leibold said: "I don't know. It was just the determination to survive. Staying alive was the one thing we had to do."

Just before their liberation on Aug. 22, 1945, they were moved to a separate section of a POW camp run by the Japanese army.

Leibold has recorded an oral history of his ordeal and was extensively interviewed by Alex Kershaw, an author who specializes in military history. Kershaw wrote the dramatic story of the Tang legend and tragedy in his 2008 book, "Escape from the Deep: The Epic Story of a Legendary Submarine and Her Courageous Crew."

"Bill is (the) last survivor of (the) greatest U.S. submarine in history," Kershaw tells me. "He helped found Navy Seals. He's a living legend in U.S. Navy. Brave, honorable, selfless, the best example of the greatest generation."

Kershaw credits Leibold with helping win the war through his role in the "silent service" — the submarine force that strangled the Japanese Empire through its sinkings and blockade. "He's also a star of my book," Kershaw notes.

After being liberated, Leibold returned to the United States to find that his wife, his high school sweetheart, Grace, was still waiting for him. A less lucky fate greeted four of the seven married ex-prisoners. Having received a telegram notifying them of the ship's loss, their brides, understandably, had moved on with their lives and remarried.

Despite his ordeal, Leibold completed a 40-year career in the Navy, returning several times to Japanese waters as commander of a submarine service/rescue ship.

Having previously been homeported in San Diego, he and Grace stayed and raised their three children in Chula Vista. The couple later built a home on Palomar Mountain, aptly nicknamed the "Ship House" for its shape and windows.

Several years later, they bought a house in Escondido. After Grace passed away, he moved into an independent living facility.

Leibold stayed in touch with his former Tang crewmates and even held a reunion in the Ship House. Floyd Caverly died in 2011, just shy of his 94th birthday and is buried here at Fort Rosecrans National Cemetary.

Leibold is the last survivor.


Back to Top
Tom McNulty View Drop Down
Rickover
Rickover


Joined: 04 Jan 2016
Location: Delaware
Status: Offline
Points: 2082
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tom McNulty Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Sep 2020 at 4:17pm
What a gracious story. Thanks.
SSBN599B,SSBN600B,SSBN611G
USNR Beaumont, TX,
USSVI Life Member
Mid Atlantic Base
Holland Club
Back to Top
PaulR View Drop Down
BBS Supporter
BBS Supporter
Avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2015
Location: Hopewell Jct NY
Status: Offline
Points: 1468
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote PaulR Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Sep 2020 at 7:47am
HAND SALUTE to ALL HEROS.
Paul



ETN2(SS) 63-67

Back to Top
610ET View Drop Down
Rickover
Rickover
Avatar

Joined: 04 Jan 2016
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Status: Offline
Points: 2186
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 610ET Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 Sep 2020 at 1:22am
Great story!

Sooner than any would like these guys will all be gone.

My 94 year old dad thinks he is the last one left of the Tirante's war crew.

An aside; all these years I thought I was the only submariner who couldn't swim.
Back to Top
SaltiDawg View Drop Down
Rickover
Rickover
Avatar

Joined: 03 Jan 2016
Location: Rockville, MD
Status: Offline
Points: 2865
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SaltiDawg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Sep 2020 at 1:51pm
Hi – I'm reading "Unrestricted Warfare: How a New Breed of Officers Led the Submarine Force to Victory in World War II" by James F. DeRose and wanted to share this quote with you.

"For Tang and its crew, the war was over. At war’s end every single officer, living or dead, was decorated with the Silver Star, Navy Cross, or, in O’Kane’s case, the Congressional Medal of Honor. Every enlisted man known to have reached the surface after the sinking also was awarded the Silver Star—save one: the “negro steward” Howard Walker, who received no commendation."

Back to Top
Rontini599 View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2016
Location: Sheridan, WY
Status: Offline
Points: 706
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rontini599 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Sep 2020 at 10:50am
Very sorry to report gentlemen that the number of ships/tonnage sunk by Tang is incorrect.
Roscoe's Submarine Operations in WWII has it as 24 ships and 93824 which is 4th best tonnage.
Blair's Silent Victory has the same numbers
BUT a very intense study later by John Alden (first published in 1989) then revised (2 ed. published in 1999) gives the Tang 27 ships but less tonnage at 90180 tons. 
The point of this is to say that the JANAC (Joint Army Navy Assessment Committee) reports from 1943-47 are very inaccurate as theyoverestimated their subs successes as they were unable to observe their attacks closely enough due to premature explosions, nighttime work, bad weather, and milling transports. JANAC also did not count small ships (under 500 tons.)  That is the reason O'Kane's total ships sunk went up with Alden's reports. 
In defense of O'Kane, however, he had the Best patrol with 10 sinkings and all his sinkings were done from Feb 44 to Oct 44.
My heroes wear dog tags, not shoulder pads
Back to Top
SaltiDawg View Drop Down
Rickover
Rickover
Avatar

Joined: 03 Jan 2016
Location: Rockville, MD
Status: Offline
Points: 2865
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SaltiDawg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Sep 2020 at 12:24pm
JANAC actually credited less than the operating force credited tonnage. I IF one accepts JANAC as more accurate, (I do not!) than the operators over-estimated tonnage. Certainly. O'Kane seemingly overestimate tonnage as a matter of routine, however JANAC frequently denied tonnage when there was seemingly indisputable corroboration of the sinkings.

Subsequent Imperial Japanese Navy Accounting reflects generally fewer sinkings and tonnage than either JANAC or credited tonnage and this info was available to John Alden. CDR Alden would likely agree that his massive effort leaves some room for error.
Back to Top
SaltiDawg View Drop Down
Rickover
Rickover
Avatar

Joined: 03 Jan 2016
Location: Rockville, MD
Status: Offline
Points: 2865
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SaltiDawg Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Sep 2020 at 1:00pm
Originally posted by SaltiDawg SaltiDawg wrote:

JANAC actually credited less than the operating force credited tonnage. I IF one accepts JANAC as more accurate, (I do not!) than the operators over-estimated tonnage. Certainly. O'Kane seemingly overestimate tonnage as a matter of routine, however JANAC frequently denied tonnage when there was seemingly indisputable corroboration of the sinkings.

Subsequent Imperial Japanese Navy Accounting reflects generally fewer sinkings and tonnage than either JANAC or credited tonnage and this info was available to John Alden. CDR Alden would likely have agreed that his massive effort leaves some room for error.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.04
Copyright ©2001-2015 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.