Navy Launches Most
High-Tech & Stealthy Attack Sub Ever
October 16, 2017, Scout.com
The Navy is now launching the most technologically
advanced attack submarine it has ever developed by christening the USS South
Dakota - a Block III Virginia-Class attack submarine engineered with a number
of never-before-seen undersea technical innovations.
While service officials say many of the details of this new
"acoustic superiority" Navy research and development effort are,
naturally, not available for public discussion, the USS South Dakota has
been a "technology demonstrator to prove out advanced technologies,"
Naval Sea Systems Command Spokeswoman Colleen O'Rourke told Scout
Warrior.
By Kris Osborn
Many of these innovations, which have been underway and
tested as prototypes for many years, are now operational as the USS South
Dakota enters service; service technology developers have, in a general way,
said the advances in undersea technologies built, integrated, tested and now
operational on the South Dakota include quieting technologies for the
engine room to make the submarine harder to detect, a new large vertical array
and additional "quieting" coating materials for the hull, Navy
officials explained.
The USS South Dakota was christened by the Navy Oct. 14 at a
General Dynamics Electric Boat facility in Groton, Ct.
"As the 7th ship of Block III, the
PCU South Dakota (SSN 790) will be the most advanced VIRGINIA
class submarine on patrol," O'Rourke said.
In recent years, the service has been making progress
developing new acoustics, sensors and quieting technologies to ensure the U.S.
retains its technological edge in the undersea domain – as countries like China
and Russia continue rapid military modernization and construction of new
submarines.
The impetus for the Navy's “acoustic superiority,” is
specifically grounded in the emerging reality that the U.S. undersea margin of
technological superiority is rapidly diminishing in light of Russian and Chinse
advances.
Described as a technology insertion, the improvements will
eventually be integrated on board both Virginia-Class submarines and the now-in
-development next-generation nuclear-armed boats called the Columbia-Class.
Some of these concepts, described as a fourth generation of
undersea technology, are based upon a “domain” perspective as opposed to a
platform approach – looking at and assessing advancements in the
electro-magnetic and acoustic underwater technologies, Navy developers
explained.
"Lessons learned from South Dakota will
be incorporated into Block V and later Virginia Class submarines, increasing
our undersea domain advantage and ensuring our dominance through the
mid-century and beyond," O'Rourke added.
The idea with “acoustic superiority,” is to engineer a
circumstance wherein U.S. submarines can operate undetected in or near enemy
waters or coastline, conduct reconnaissance or attack missions and sense any
movement or enemy activities at farther ranges than adversaries can.
Acoustic sensor technology works by using underwater
submarine sensors to detect sound “pings” in order to determine the contours,
speed and range of an enemy ship, submarine or approaching weapon. Much like
radar analyzes the return electromagnetic signal bounced off an object,
acoustics works by using “sound” in a similar fashion. Most of the undersea
acoustic technology is “passive,” meaning it is engineered to receive pings and
“listen” without sending out a signal which might reveal their undersea
presence or location to an enemy, Navy technology developers explained.
Some of these concepts, described as a fourth generation of
undersea technology, are based upon a “domain” perspective as opposed to a
platform approach – looking at and assessing advancements in the
electro-magnetic and acoustic underwater technologies, Navy developers
explained.
The new “acoustic superiority” effort is immersed in performing
tactical assessments as well as due diligence from an academic standpoint to
make sure the service looks at all the threat vectors – whether that be
hydrodynamics, acoustics, lasers, among others.
The emerging technologies, however, are heavily focused upon
sensitive, passive acoustic sensors able to detect movement and objects of
potential adversary boats and ships at much further ranges and with a
higher-degree of fidelity. While high-frequency, fast two-way communication is
currently difficult to sustain from the undersea domain, submarines are able to
use a Very Low Frequency radio to communicate while at various depths beneath
the surface, Navy leaders told Warrior.
Building upon developments with the South Dakota, the Navy,
DARPA and industry are continuing to explore a new-generation of undersea
technologies including quieter, stronger, longer-range communications, sonar
detection and undersea drone autonomy.
The Defense Advanced Research Project Agency and BAE-Systems
have begun a high-tech project to engineer undersea drones that can use active
sonar to find enemy submarines and network back to a host submarine in
real-time.
The project, called Mobile Offboard Clandestine
Communications and Approach (MOCCA) program, brings the prospect of a major
breakthrough in undersea communications technology – allowing submarines to
detect enemies from a much safer standoff distance. These days, in the
dangerous and complication realm of undersea warfare, most undersea drones
typically gather intelligence before returning to download data at the mother
ship; this emerging technology would enable near real-time undersea
connectivity between drones and larger submarines.
Instead of using passive sonar technology which listens
for acoustic “pings” picked up from undersea enemy movement, MOCCA plans to use
active sonar technology able to proactively send active acoustic pings forward
and analyze the return signal to discern the counters, speed, shape and
distance of an enemy submarine – all while enabling the host submarine retain
its stealth properties.
Using satellite integrated telemetry, some underwater drones
can transmit information back to boats in near real time; this provides a
substantial tactical advantage because smaller drones are less detectable to
enemy sonar and therefore able to access areas that are more difficult for
larger submarines to penetrate. Such a technology allows for closer-in
reconnaissance missions when it comes to operating in enemy territory, close to
the shoreline, or overcoming the anti-access/area-denial challenges posed by
potential adversaries.
Such scenarios, envisioned for the not-too-distant future,
provide the conceptual foundation of the Navy’s emerging drone strategy. The
idea is to capitalize upon the fast increasing speed of computer processing and
rapid improvements in the development of autonomy-increasing algorithms; this
will allow unmanned systems to quickly operate with an improved level of
autonomy, function together as part of an integrated network, and more quickly
perform a wider range of functions without needing every individual task
controlled by humans.
Groups of underwater drones will soon simultaneously use
sonar and different sensors to identify and destroy enemy submarines and
surface ships, search for mines, collect oceanographic data and conduct
reconnaissance missions – all while a single human performs command and control
functions aboard a Navy ship or submarine, senior service officials explained.
The approach is designed as a mission multiplier to increase
efficiency and perform a wider range of functions much more quickly. Armed with
a small fleet of underwater drones, a submarine or destroyer will be able to
perform higher-priority missions while allowing unmanned systems to quickly
gather and transmit combat-relevant tactical and strategic information.
Study: US Undersea Technological Dominance in Jeopardy
Senior Navy officials have explained that the
innovations contained in the USS South Dakota do, at least in part, help
address an issue raised by a report several years ago by the Center for
Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.
The report, titled “The Emerging Era in Undersea Warfare,”
says the technological margin of difference separating the U.S from potential
rivals is expected to get much smaller. This is requiring the U.S. to re-think
the role of manned submarines and prioritize innovation in the realm of
undersea warfare, the study says.
“America’s superiority in undersea warfare results from
decades of research and development, operations, and training. It is, however,
far from assured. U.S. submarines are the world’s quietest, but new detection
techniques are emerging that don’t rely on the noise a submarine makes, and may
make traditional manned submarine operations far more risky in the future.
America’s competitors are likely pursuing these technologies even while
expanding their own undersea forces,” writes the report’s author Bryan
Clark.
In the report, Clark details some increasingly available
technologies expected to change the equation regarding U.S. undersea
technological supremacy. They include increased use of lower frequency active
sonar and non-acoustic methods of detecting submarine wakes at short ranges. In
particular, Clark cites a technique of bouncing laser light or
light-emitting-diodes off of a submarine hull to detect its presence.
“The physics behind most of these alternative techniques has
been known for decades, but was not exploited because computer processors were
too slow to run the detailed models needed to see small changes in the
environment caused by a quiet submarine. Today, ‘big data” processing enables
advanced navies to run sophisticated oceanographic models in real time to
exploit these detection techniques,” Clark writes.
Although the CSBA study was published several years ago now,
the issues it raises have been of great relevance to developers of undersea
technology working to sustain US dominance in an increasingly contested domain.
In addition, Navy developers have specifically said that many newer innovations
have been engineered to address the concerns mentioned in the study.
Chinese Submarine Threat
When asked about the pace of Chinese undersea military
construction and modernization, Navy officials say that the Navy is focused on
sustaining the research and development, or R&D, sufficient to ensure the
U.S. retains its technological superiority.
Maintaining an advanced submarine fleet, and strategic
nuclear deterrence in particular, is all the more pressing and significant now
that China has operational nuclear-armed JL-2 missiles able to hit part of the
United States, Navy developers say.
Several Congressional reports in recent years have pointed
out that Chinese modernization plans call for a sharp increase in attack
submarines and nuclear-armed submarines or SSBNs. Chinese SSBNs are
now able to patrol with nuclear-armed JL-2 missiles able to strike targets more
than 4,500 nautical miles.
The Chinese are currently working on a new,
modernized SSBN platform as well as a long-range missile, the JL-3,
Congressional information says.
|